Anyhow, Fannie makes the same old procreation/infertility argument as if I hadn't debunked it a hundred times:
This past weekend, a relatively of mine got married for the fourth time. She is in her mid-50s and has had a hysterectomy.Fannie, she is ALLOWED to reproduce with her chosen partner because they have complementary sex cells (and aren't already married, under 18, or related by a prohibited relationship). They aren't required to procreate, they are ALLOWED to procreate. All marriages should always be allowed to procreate using their own genes. No one should be allowed to procreate with someone of the same sex.
There will never be a link between procreation and marriage in her marriage. Just like every same-sex couple.
She gets to legally marry her chosen partner because she and her partner have the “correct” sex composition- male and female- and not because they have the ability or potential to procreate together.
It shouldn't be hard to remember this simple argument, that same-sex couples should not have the equal right to procreate that a married man and woman have.